Leaving passivity behind: Notes on social war
Confronted with those who neglect to recognize themselves in our conspiracies of negation, we offer neither dialogue nor sympathy but only our scorn.To those who deride the inoperative joy in a smashed window or a moment of friendship, we propose nothing less than to destroy their pathetic absence, by any means necessary. In the setting forth of zones of offensive capacity, we negate those who would have us give up the radical ecstasy of insurrection for the misery of normalization. What's needed is not representation, and even far less banality, but a putting-into-practice of immanent indifference, a rejection in all forms of the temporality of activism. Every car set aflame is a refusal to negotiate, a blow against the being of anarcho-liberalism, a recognition of the singular logic inherent in the articulation of desiring-bodies.
We must shatter all totality—for once and for all. The homogenous mobilization proposed to us is like a bad joke, and instead of laughter we respond with crisis. Our need to riot is less the elaboration of a plan than the construction of an event. It is necessary to commence absolutely; not to dream of new ways to be productive, but to make manifest the subterranean becomings in the heart of each barricaded hallway.
Confronted with those who neglect to recognize themselves in our conspiracies of negation, we offer neither dialogue nor sympathy but only our scorn. This is a call to rupture, not an insistence on humanism.AGAIN