Leaving mobilization behind: Notes towards rupture
It is necessary to commence for once and for all; not to dream of new ways to negotiate, but to make manifest the subterranean multiplicities in the heart of each smashed window.What's needed is not humanism, and even far less activism, but a putting-into-practice of singular indifference, a rejection in all forms of the teleology of banality. It is necessary to commence for once and for all; not to dream of new ways to negotiate, but to make manifest the subterranean multiplicities in the heart of each smashed window. Our need to riot is less the construction of a concept than the realization of a line of flight. In the elaboration of becomings, we shatter those who would have us give up the inoperative joy of crisis for the catastrophe of absence.
The homogenous normalization proposed to us is like a bad joke, and instead of laughter we respond with zones of indistinction which need no justification. Confronted with those who refuse to recognize themselves in our orgies of destruction, we offer neither sympathy nor dialogue but only our scorn. We must negate all totality—without illusions. To those who deride the radical ecstasy in a moment of friendship or a burning dumpster, we propose nothing less than to reject their pathetic impotentiality, by any means necessary.
Every barricaded hallway is a refusal to make demands, a blow against the being of liberalism, a recognition of the immanent logic inherent in the articulation of communes. This is a call to insurrection, not an insistence on fossilization of our desires.AGAIN