Leaving mobilization behind: Notes towards insurrection
Our need to riot is less the articulation of a plan than the elaboration of an event.
Our need to riot is less the articulation of a plan than the elaboration of an event. This is a call to indifference, not an insistence on activism. The homogenous humanism proposed to us is like a bad joke, and instead of laughter we respond with social war. Every burning dumpster is a refusal to organize, a blow against the teleology of anarcho-liberalism, a recognition of the inoperative being inherent in the articulation of desiring-bodies.
In the setting forth of zones of offensive capacity, we reject those who would have us give up the radical joy of zones of indistinction which need no justification for the catastrophe of representation. Confronted with those who fail to recognize themselves in our conspiracies of negation, we offer neither sympathy nor dialogue but only our scorn. We must negate all normalization—in secret. What's needed is not passivity, and even far less banality, but a putting-into-practice of singular rupture, a rejection in all forms of the structure of fossilization of our desires.
To those who deride the immanent ecstasy in a car set aflame or a c-clamped pushbar, we propose nothing less than to destroy their compulsive absence, without looking back. It is necessary to commence without illusions; not to dream of new ways to negotiate, but to make manifest the subterranean communes in the heart of each moment of friendship.
AGAIN
why+code